Brief review
*Title: The
efficacy of lumbar discectomy and single-level fusion for spondylolisthesis:
results from the NeuroPoint-SD registry.
*Author: Zoher Ghogawala, Christopher I. Shaffrey, Anthony
L. Asher, Robert F. Heary, Tanya Logvinenko, Neil R. Malhotra, Stephen J.
Dante, R. John Hurlbert, Andrea F. Douglas, Subu N. Magge, Praveen V. Mumm
aneni, Joseph S. Cheng, Justin S. Smith, Michael G. Kaiser, Khalid M. Abbed, Daniel
M. Sciubba, Daniel K. Resnick
*Bibliography: J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Nov;19(5):555-63.
Object
Purpose:
-To establish a multicenter cooperative research group.
-To demonstrate the feasibility of developing a registry
to assess the efficacy of common lumbar spinal procedures.
Methods
▶Study
type: Observational prospective cohort study (13 US academic, community sites)
▶Subject:
Total 160 patients (lumbar disc herniation 125 + spondylolisthesis 35)
-Unselected patients undergoing lumbar discectomy or
single-level fusion for spondylolisthesis.
▶Follow-up
time: 1, 3, 6, 12 months after surgery
▶Evaluation
method: SF-36, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and visual analog scale (VAS)
-pre&post
Results
-There were 198 enrolled over 1 year.
▶Median
age: 45 yrs (49% female) for lumbar discectomy (n = 148)/
58 yrs (58% female) for lumbar spondylolisthesis (n = 50)
▶Complications:
12 patients (6.1%) -At 30 days
(10 patients (6.8%) with disc herniation and 1 (2%) with
spondylolisthesis)
▶Follow-up
rate: 88.3% (over 1 yr)
▶Clinical outcomes(VAS, ODI, SF-36 scores): Both
lumbar discectomy and single-level fusion procedures were significant
improvements(p ≤ 0.0002).
▶Return to work: 80% of patients (for 1 yr).
-Flow diagram
of the NeuroPoint-SD study showing enrollment and follow-up compliance rates.
Conclusions
-It is feasible to build a national spine registry for
the collection of high-quality prospective data to demonstrate the
effectiveness of spinal procedures in actual practice.
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기